2026 Massachusetts Ballot Guide
11 ballot questions. Plain-English explanations, hidden loopholes exposed, and Gil's progressive recommendation for every single one.
Referendum on the Act Modernizing Firearm Laws (H. 4885)
VOTE NOThis vote decides whether to keep or cancel a 2024 Massachusetts gun safety law. The law creates a real-time gun registry, bans new assault-style weapons, requires safety training for a permit, and allows schools or doctors to ask a judge to temporarily remove guns from people in crisis.
The double-negative trap: A "YES" vote means you want to repeal (cancel) the law, not support it. Working-class voters who support gun safety are frequently tricked into voting the wrong way. A NO vote keeps the gun safety law in place.
An Act to Protect Tenants by Limiting Rent Increases
VOTE YESThis law caps how much a landlord can raise your rent each year. The maximum increase is either inflation or 5%, whichever is lower. It exempts small owner-occupied buildings (4 units or fewer), short-term rentals, and any building constructed in the last 10 years.
The luxury developer loophole: The "new construction" exemption (10 years) was written by real estate lobbyists to protect corporate developers. New luxury apartment buildings remain fully exempt, which can accelerate gentrification in growing neighborhoods.
An Act Reducing the State Personal Income Tax Rate
VOTE NOThis law cuts the state income tax from 5% to 4% over three years. Everyone gets the same percentage cut, whether you earn $30,000 a year or $3 million. A flat tax cut sounds fair but it isn't — it hands thousands back to executives while giving workers pocket change, and drains billions from public schools and transit.
"Flat tax for all" hides inequality: A 1% cut saves a working-class person a few hundred dollars, but returns tens of thousands to wealthy individuals, while gutting the public budget that funds the services working people actually rely on.
An Act Limiting State Tax Collection Growth
VOTE NOThis law changes the formula the state uses to cap its own revenue. By lowering the cap, it forces the state to return tax money to residents more frequently, leaving less in the budget for public programs. The rebates disproportionately benefit high earners.
Austerity dressed up as a refund: The dense "administrative mechanism" language hides a deliberate trap: structurally engineering state revenue formulas to force budget cuts to healthcare, housing, and education under the guise of giving taxpayers their money back.
An Act to Eliminate Recreational Marijuana Sales
VOTE NOThis law shuts down all legal, licensed marijuana stores and bans growing cannabis at home. Adults over 21 could still possess up to one ounce without penalty. But the legal marketplace — including all its jobs and tax revenue — would be eliminated.
Re-criminalizing home growing: Banning personal cultivation reopens the door to policing inside residential spaces and destroys working-class self-sufficiency. The "possession stays legal" framing distracts from what's actually being taken away: unionized cannabis jobs, state tax revenue, and regulated consumer safety.
An Act to Implement All-Party State Primaries
VOTE NOThis eliminates separate Democratic and Republican primaries. Instead, every candidate runs on one shared ballot. Only the top two vote-getters advance to November, even if they're from the same party.
The third-party lockout: "Top-two" primary systems sound democratic, but in practice they almost always produce a November ballot between two well-funded, corporate-backed moderates, locking out socialist, Green, and progressive third-party candidates entirely.
An Act Making Legislature and Governor's Office Subject to Public Records
VOTE YESThis law requires the state legislature and the Governor's office to follow public records transparency laws, meaning citizens can request to see their documents. Currently, the Massachusetts legislature is one of the most secretive in the country.
The lobbyist loophole: The exemption for "development of public policy" is dangerously broad. It could be used to keep backroom negotiations with industry lobbyists completely shielded from public view. Transparency is still a net win.
An Act Providing for Same-Day Voter Registration
VOTE YESThis law lets you register to vote or update your address at the polls on the same day you vote, including during early voting. Currently, Massachusetts requires registration at least 10 days before an election.
Location restrictions: The "designated polling location" requirement can still pose challenges for unhoused or highly mobile voters. Same-day registration is a clear democratic gain, but advocates should continue pushing for greater flexibility.
An Act Limiting Required Lot Size for Single-Family Homes
VOTE YESThis law prevents wealthy suburban towns from using large minimum lot-size rules to block housing construction. It allows homes to be built on smaller lots (5,000 sq ft) where town water and sewer exist.
Single-family only: The law only applies to detached single-family homes, not multi-family buildings or tenant co-ops. It weakens exclusionary zoning without fully enabling the dense, truly affordable housing that working-class families need.
An Act Establishing the Nature for All Fund
VOTE YESThis law creates a dedicated state fund for natural resource conservation, clean water protection, environmental justice programs, and expanding public access to parks and green spaces, with a specific focus on low-income communities.
No polluter tax: The fund draws from existing state revenue rather than levying a dedicated tax on corporate polluters or fossil fuel companies. This forces environmental justice programs to compete with healthcare and social safety net budgets.
An Act Permitting Collective Bargaining for Public Defense Employees
VOTE YESThis law grants state public defenders, social workers, and staff the legal right to form a union and collectively bargain for better pay, manageable caseloads, and improved working conditions.
The "certain" carveout: The word "certain" in the law's title leaves room for management to legally separate administrative staff or contract workers from the core bargaining unit, deliberately fragmenting worker solidarity.
Share This Guide
Your neighbors deserve to know what they're voting for. Send them this guide before November 3rd.
Get Involved with the Campaign →